Seaside: Wharf

This is a guest article synthesized from articles by Epoch and WanderingWinder in the forum.

Wharf

Dominion: Seaside

Wharf is, bar none, the best card-drawer in the game.

And on some level, that’s all you need to know.  Card drawing is valuable.  Wharf is the best one.  It works well in all the cases that you want to draw cards.  It excels, paired with a village-type card, in a cards/actions engine.  It is also extremely good, bought in moderation, with a Big Money deck, or practically any other deck.

It may be a bit surprising that Wharf is the best card drawer in the game.  It, after all, gives only +2 Cards, in the same category as such low-tier terminal drawers such as Witch, Steward, and Vault (all of which are good cards, mind you, but not principally due to their ability to draw cards).  Of course, Wharf gives you the +2 Cards effect twice, but the general rule in Dominion is that one big turn counts more than two little turns, so you might imagine that Smithy, with its +3 Cards now, would beat Wharf, with its +4 Cards split up in two.

In practice, what separates Wharf from everything else is its duration effect.  A Moat with a +Buy this turn is OK, not so great, but starting off next turn with the equivalent of Worker’s Village + Smithy is a gamechanger.  It’s like two Labs, with +Buy to make it all the sweeter.  And the key is that its card draw next turn is essentially non-terminal; you don’t use up your Action to get the increased handsize.

As a result, Wharf is arguably the best card in the game which you cannot use to give a Curse to your opponent. It’s versatile, effective in just about every kind of game, and links into all sorts of combinations.  Very few decks aren’t significantly improved with Wharves.

The power of Wharf

Synergies

It is instructive to think through things that Wharf works really well with, and what Wharf doesn’t, because it helps highlight all of Wharf’s strengths and weaknesses.

Wharf pairs well with Peddler.  Wharf not only gives you the +Buy to take advantage of cheap Peddlers, but the fact that it’s a Duration (and therefore stays in play for two turns) means that you’ll often be able to get Peddlers for $2 or less.

Wharf is a natural fit with Throne Room and King’s Court.  There are many reasons for this: first, and most naturally, is that with big hands, your TR’s and KC’s are more likely to hit, and more importantly, more likely to land the killing KC-KC blows.  More subtly, if you draw KC-Council Room, you sort of have a big turn this turn, but it’s wasted if you draw all Actions.  KC-Wharf might waste this turn a little bit, but then next turn you get to start with 11 cards!

Wharf works with Cellar and Warehouse, both of which require large hands to maximize their effectiveness.  This is one of those rare times where Cellar may outperform Warehouse: Wharf’s +Buy lets you pick it up easy, and with such big handsizes you might actually want to discard more than 3 cards.

Wharf is absurdly strong with special Treasures: in particular, Fool’s Gold/Wharf is absolutely brutal.  Wharf gives you the two things that FG wants – +buys and big handsizes.  Bank and Wharf love each other for very similar reasons.

On the flip side, Wharf works poorly with Menagerie.  Menagerie really needs some early trashing to get its massive card draw, and such early trashing is unnecessary for Wharf.  Plus, Menagerie’s benefit (some more cards) is not that helpful with Wharf providing all the cards you need, and the Wharf duration effect actually hurts your odds of activating the Menagerie.

Big Money

If you believe the simulators, and you probably should for Big Money matchups, Wharf is the 5th-best single card for Big Money, after the four top cursers: Young Witch, Witch, Mountebank, and Sea Hag. (Yes, it does beat Familiar.)   And the thing is, with most of the cursers, 1 curser into Wharf is going to be very good on such boards anyway.

Now, how do you want to play Wharf for money? Well, there are actually several viable ways, depending a bit on what your opponent does. But in general (and say for a mirror), you want to get a couple Wharves before gold, pretty much no matter what, and then get a good bit of money, with a third and maybe fourth Wharf, before turning for green. In fact, it almost plays a little like an engine: in most Big Money strategies (say Smithy/BM), you want to green pretty fast — only a couple Silvers and a Gold is enough.  But with Wharf, the +Buy means it’s often worthwhile to build up a tiny bit extra buying power before going green.

Another key distinction is that you can get a bit more Wharves than with most terminals, because the Wharf stays in play and therefore is slightly less likely to draw other Wharves dead.  And the fact that Wharf costs $5 is nice; most Big Money type engines really struggle with $5 turns.

In general, there’s basically no other easy Big Money strategy that beats Wharf, and it beats most simple combos too: Chancellor/Stash, Treasure Map/Warehouse, Tactician/Vault, etc.  It even holds its own against the more complex combos: Hunting Party/terminal Silver, Embassy/Tunnel, Native Village/Bridge.  About the only thing it can’t deal with is the Golden Deck (where you open Bishop/Chapel and trash down to Bishop/Gold/Gold/Silver/Province) and fast Gardens games, but then few things will beat those decks.

Engines

The one thing that you always want with an engine is +buy.  This lets you catch up with faster-to-accelerate but lower top-speed decks like Big Money.  Convenient, then, that Wharf builds it right into your engine, which both enables you to buy multiple engine components in the early-mid game, and also catch up on greens in the late game.  Without Wharf, you’ll have to divert from buying engine pieces to pick up Markets, Pawns, or possibly other suboptimal cards, in rough proportion to your engine; with Wharf, you get one free with every Wharf, a card you already wanted to stock up on.  (Note that this means that Wharf engines, even more so than most engines, is likely to lead to a game ending on piles.)

Like most draw cards, building an engine is not just about adding a Village to a Wharf/Big Money deck.  Wharf/Money beats Village/Wharf, typically, unless that Village produces money for you or allows you to play a bunch of other Actions.  But any Village that gives some money, like Bazaar or Festival, is going to be awesome.  And Fishing Village, of course, is Fishing Village.  FV/Wharf is one of the most destructively dominant 2-card engine combos around.

Wharf really shines with cheap Villages in general.  Its +Buy means that you aren’t really “wasting” your turn when you pick up Native Village and Hamlet; they are cheap enough that you can often scrounge one or two up on your turns while buying other things.  Crossroads is a total superstar, since it both gives Actions and also takes advantage of your massive handsizes.  And Border Village, as always, is a great for Wharf: you’ll often want to buy Wharf on $6 anyway, so the BV is just icing.

Engine-wise also, what the card gives you is zillions more cards. Other card draw qua card draw isn’t necessarily bad, but you usually want Wharf instead. Now, if it holds a good attack, a la Margrave or Ghost Ship, you might make an exception for a copy or two. But the bread-and-butter of the engine should almost always be Wharf, because it’s just more powerful.

It’s also important to note that Wharf engines build a good bit differently than those based around other draw cards. Basically, you need fewer Villages and/or can support more other terminals. The reason for this is that you only need to actually play half of your mighty nice draw cards every turn, even while reaping the benefits of those you played last turn. So when I build a Wharf engine, I usually start Wharf-Wharf-Village-Wharf and then alternate. Well, okay, usually it’s more complicated, because I want to get other stuff, too, but you really don’t need that many Villages to support the draw part of your engine. And the +buys are very nicely and plentifully built in.

As for trashing, trashing somewhat helps a Wharf engine, as it does with most engines, but it really doesn’t help Wharf that much.  It’s easy to end up “over-drawing”, where you don’t have anything left to draw, and trashing slows you down in the race.  So you especially need your trashing to be doing work later in the game — Remake and Masquerade are OK, whereas Chapel and Ambassador less so (Ambassador especially because you might Ambassador all your stuff away only to see a Wharf/money deck absorb the Ambassador and beat you before you get your engine set up).  And Lookout, Moneylender, Spice Merchant, etc., are just not that meaningful.  Especially with something like Fishing Village/Wharf, even the smallest trashing is going to set you back, and you have so much draw you won’t need it at all.

What Wharf does, really, is set you up with consistently massive handsizes.  Council Room may be superficially similar, but it’s more swingy and less reliable; Wharf chains essentially ensure that every turn starts with a minimum of 7 cards.  Where you take your engine after that is up to you, but lots of Kingdom cards favor an engine Wharf as opposed to a money Wharf.  Coppersmith, Outpost, attacks that you’ll be playing every turn, Bank, etc.  Cards like Minion and Lab and Tactician don’t really help, and if anything hurt by promoting alternative strategies.  But the key is, with just about every engine, you’ll want big hands, and there is no easier route to big hands than with Wharf.

Works with:

  • Throne Room / King’s Court
  • Peddler
  • Cellar/Warehouse
  • Bank, Fool’s Gold
  • Fishing Village, Crossroads, other cheap Villages
  • Just about everything

Doesn’t work with:

  • Hunting Party, Laboratory, Minion, terminal draw (not that these are actively bad, but that they don’t particularly help a Wharf deck and do help alternative decks)
  • Tactician
  • Trashing
  • Menagerie
  • Mega-rush strategies, like Ironworks/Gardens
This entry was posted in Seaside. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Seaside: Wharf

  1. ackmondual says:

    For the vast majority of the time, far superior to Outpost

  2. Jonathan says:

    I presume there should be more to this post than 2 sentences?

    • Anonymous says:

      “Wharf is, bar none, the best card-drawer in the game.

      And on some level, that’s all you need to know.”

      And we’re done. Good job everybody. See you next article.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Part of me believes that the first sentence is all you really need.

  4. ftl says:

    The post is an analogy to Wharf. The first part of it is sort of underwhelming, but if you wait a day/turn, the secnd part will blow you away.

    • ftl says:

      It’s true! The next day happened, and the Wharf article suddenly became amazing rather than just being a terminated +2 sentences.

  5. ackmondual says:

    Yes captain… Perhaps today IS a good day to die.

  6. enquerencia says:

    Oh, I get it. Playing it without other actions leads to… D’oh!

  7. axlemn says:

    Wharf is such a great card in combo decks. Thinking of it’s power only as +2 cards at the beginning of next turn captures much of the power of the card, but makes it somewhat puzzling really wrap your mind around. Think about Wharf / FV.

    A single Wharf / Fishing Village played every turn without fail is simply 1 extra money and an extra buy every single turn. You end up with 5 cards. Why should this be so strong? It would seem massing Markets and Oases would be just as good.

    Truth be told, mass Market / Oasis would be as strong. But the difference is that you /start/ with 7 cards in each hand. This means your odds of drawing the combo piece of FV/Wharf is inherently much higher. Everything good gets played much more often.

    Wharf is my absolute favorite card, but I’ve won games because I spent my 5 on a Smithy, while my opponent spends his 5 on a fifth Wharf. The truth is, once you get a high enough starting hand density, Wharves aren’t nearly as useful as just having other combo pieces. They’re expensive – not only do they cost 5, but they can’t be played every turn.

  8. another way to put that, axlemn, is that if you are drawing your deck every turn, smithy draws 6 cards total and wharf draws 4.

  9. Anonymous says:

    “Engine-wise also, what the card gives you is zillions more cards. Other card draw qua card draw isn’t necessarily bad, but you usually want wharf instead. Now, if it holds a good attack, a la margrave or ghost ship, you might make an exception for a copy or two. But the bread-and-butter of the engine should almost always be wharf, because it’s just more powerful.”

    This paragraph for some reason does not have capitalized card names.

  10. Anonymous says:

    In summary…

    Turn 1:
    +2 Cards
    +1 Buy

    Turn 2:
    +2 Cards
    +1 Buy
    +1 Action

  11. Lenoxus says:

    I assume it also conflicts with “Draw up to” cards like Library and Jack? Or maybe not.

    • axlemn says:

      True. Also worth noting that it conflicts with these less than Smithy does if you have lots of discard-down costs. You’re more likely to draw them and be able to play them with Wharf than with Smithy.

  12. clb says:

    What is the speculation on Hunting Grounds v Wharf as terminal draw? I tend to agree with WW that it would be worse for BM (you don’t need that many cards (see: Courtyard) and will probably be overpaying), but for engines I can see Hunting Grounds being a great drawer, but what will that price point do?

    And a second question; why is Young Witch better for BM than Witch (I am assuming that the cards were listed in order of strength):
    “Wharf is the 5th-best single card for Big Money, after the four top cursers: Young Witch, Witch, Mountebank, and Sea Hag.”

    • ftl says:

      Well, presumably Young Witch is better than Witch for big money, because you can buy it on turn 1 on a 4/3 opening instead of waiting a shuffle.

      There’s not much to be read into that really. For Young Witch, it depends on the Bane card and how the bane fits into the kingdom, which the simulators won’t really consider.

  13. brokoli says:

    ” This is one of those rare times where Cellar may outperform Warehouse”
    From my experience, cellar>Warehouse in basically all large-hand strategies.

  14. Chris says:

    I just had a game last night with hunting party and wharf and man they comboed well together. The hunting parties found lots of good stuff in my deck including a wharf almost every turn. So I started each turn with the wharf which was in play from the turn before and ended with playing another wharf. The engine worked very well.

  15. zahlman says:

    Wharf/X Village doesn’t always need coin-producing villages to be effective. I played recently with Wharf/Worker’s Village/Highway and it was absolutely brutal:

    http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201209/07/game-20120907-021336-650519a4.html

    I didn’t even execute this optimally… probably should stop at 7 Highways, maybe 6.

  16. Alex Zorach says:

    One thing I don’t see mentioned in this article or in the comments, is that when you have a powerhouse combo like FV/Wharf on the board, both piles tend to empty fast.

    This, combined with the abundant +Buy, makes rush strategies based on emptying a cheap pile highly effective. I recently won a game by doing this with Islands. But I can see it working with either getting a province lead and then emptying another pile (especially something like pawn that doesn’t hurt your deck), or with boards with gardens but without the best gardens enablers like Ironworks or Workshop.

    Even if you aren’t going for a rush strategy based on emptying the three piles, it’s important to consider this because your opponent might do it. This is a trap I’ve fallen into, not realizing that the piles are getting low, and thinking–wow, “I have a more powerful engine than my opponent” only to find the game end with my opponent in a narrow VP lead from Duchies or Estates.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s